<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Homepage Can&#8217;t Get Simpler Than This!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techpp.com/2009/12/03/google-homepage-cant-get-simpler-than-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techpp.com/2009/12/03/google-homepage-cant-get-simpler-than-this/</link>
	<description>Tech Blog covering Tech News, Views, Reviews on iPhone, Android, Online tools, Social media, Gadgets, Windows and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Chethan</title>
		<link>http://techpp.com/2009/12/03/google-homepage-cant-get-simpler-than-this/comment-page-1/#comment-13214</link>
		<dc:creator>Chethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techpp.com/?p=7936#comment-13214</guid>
		<description>Nice Post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Wave</title>
		<link>http://techpp.com/2009/12/03/google-homepage-cant-get-simpler-than-this/comment-page-1/#comment-12993</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Wave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techpp.com/?p=7936#comment-12993</guid>
		<description>Very slick, I haven&#039;t looked at the code and I don&#039;t intend to but, surely the code required to handle the fade-in outweighs the original weight of the standard version?  So is it quicker?  Or just slicker..?  
Either way, I like it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very slick, I haven&#8217;t looked at the code and I don&#8217;t intend to but, surely the code required to handle the fade-in outweighs the original weight of the standard version?  So is it quicker?  Or just slicker..?<br />
Either way, I like it <img src='http://cdn.techpp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raju</title>
		<link>http://techpp.com/2009/12/03/google-homepage-cant-get-simpler-than-this/comment-page-1/#comment-12988</link>
		<dc:creator>Raju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techpp.com/?p=7936#comment-12988</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s working fine on Firefox, which browser you are using? Somehow it didn&#039;t work on Chrome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s working fine on Firefox, which browser you are using? Somehow it didn&#8217;t work on Chrome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aastha</title>
		<link>http://techpp.com/2009/12/03/google-homepage-cant-get-simpler-than-this/comment-page-1/#comment-12986</link>
		<dc:creator>Aastha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techpp.com/?p=7936#comment-12986</guid>
		<description>bt it is nt working in my browser, automatically resorts itself to http://www.google.co.in/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bt it is nt working in my browser, automatically resorts itself to <a href="http://www.google.co.in/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.co.in/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aastha</title>
		<link>http://techpp.com/2009/12/03/google-homepage-cant-get-simpler-than-this/comment-page-1/#comment-12985</link>
		<dc:creator>Aastha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techpp.com/?p=7936#comment-12985</guid>
		<description>neat n clean :) google rocks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neat n clean <img src='http://cdn.techpp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  google rocks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruchi</title>
		<link>http://techpp.com/2009/12/03/google-homepage-cant-get-simpler-than-this/comment-page-1/#comment-12977</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techpp.com/?p=7936#comment-12977</guid>
		<description>I have just seen after reading the post, this is really looking cleaner now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just seen after reading the post, this is really looking cleaner now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucifer@Blog Contests</title>
		<link>http://techpp.com/2009/12/03/google-homepage-cant-get-simpler-than-this/comment-page-1/#comment-12973</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucifer@Blog Contests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techpp.com/?p=7936#comment-12973</guid>
		<description>I Had Noticed this before only...nd when we hover the mouse the elements become visible...however it looks good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Had Noticed this before only&#8230;nd when we hover the mouse the elements become visible&#8230;however it looks good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via cdn.techpp.com

Served from: techpp.com @ 2012-05-25 11:04:57 -->
